On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > From my point of view, what is required is the state of agreement > itself, not the evidence that such a state exists (so I would hold the > strict approach to be unnecessary). The game does not purport to > regulate me changing my mind.
Verrry slippery. Take it from the other side, then. What is to prevent you from saying "hey! In between my posting consent and you posting the message, I (quietly to myself) changed my mind!" -Goethe
