On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Finally, a question for you and root:  Taking the strict approach
>  of R2157, if you say "I hereby agree for Goethe to post this message
>  on behalf of this panel" what makes you think you *can* revoke that
>  permission?  You have given the permission, and the poster posts
>  "with" that permission, what mechanism lets you take it back again
>  (true curiosity here, I'm wondering where the assumption comes from).

>From my point of view, what is required is the state of agreement
itself, not the evidence that such a state exists (so I would hold the
strict approach to be unnecessary).  The game does not purport to
regulate me changing my mind.

If I thought the strict approach to be necessary, I would agree with you.

-root

Reply via email to