On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Finally, a question for you and root: Taking the strict approach > of R2157, if you say "I hereby agree for Goethe to post this message > on behalf of this panel" what makes you think you *can* revoke that > permission? You have given the permission, and the poster posts > "with" that permission, what mechanism lets you take it back again > (true curiosity here, I'm wondering where the assumption comes from).
>From my point of view, what is required is the state of agreement itself, not the evidence that such a state exists (so I would hold the strict approach to be unnecessary). The game does not purport to regulate me changing my mind. If I thought the strict approach to be necessary, I would agree with you. -root