On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My thoughts, as a watcher (and not a player in either Agora or Agoran
> Twister) is that a necessary condition to the validity of a Spot
> should be that it is possible for any Innie to legally satisfy the
> obligations imposed by the spot by either a declaration of OKAY or NO
> WAY. Failure to meet requirements of other spots in the same game
> aren't considered, for this purpose, "illegal" (but failure to perform
> as obligated isn't satisfying them, either)
Seems reasonable.
> In a game, a Keith announces the spot: {Declare "OKAY" on all spots in
> this game.} This is not a valid spot because while it is possible to
> satisfy this spot if OKAY is declared by a Keith, a declaration of "No
> WAY" would immediately result in a failure to satisfy the obligation
> imposed by this spot.
I don't follow. If I declare NO WAY on such a spot, then my
obligation is just to declare NO WAY on at least one spot in the game.
Since I have just done that, it is already satisfied.
-root
