root wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 3:14 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 15/03/2008, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > Spot: Initiate at least one judicial case per week. >> > >> > If someone Opined NO WAY on this, how would they Break it? >> >> By initiating a judicial case? > > Oh, I see what you mean. If I opine NO WAY and then initiate a > judicial case, then I haven't broken the Spot because I still might > not initiate a judicial case next week.
Someone should write up an amendment to the effect of "if the spot refers to a recurring type of time period, then each instance of that type of time period is evaluated separately for violations".
