Wooble wrote: > Does this mean that a single player can indefinitely delay the > ratification of any document without violating rule 2149 simply by > making claims of error that are themselves true statements but that > are completely irrelevant to the document in question? (e.g., claim of > error: 2+2=4)
RtR. There's an RtR going on. It's still going on. It's still an RtR. :) Rule 1551: "explaining the scope and nature of the perceived error"
