On Feb 8, 2008 10:17 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So your claim of error is that the report of the voting results > erroneously did not report your claim of error, which itself isn't > part of the voting results? > > Does this mean that a single player can indefinitely delay the > ratification of any document without violating rule 2149 simply by > making claims of error that are themselves true statements but that > are completely irrelevant to the document in question? (e.g., claim of > error: 2+2=4)
I don't think so. A claim of error is inherently a claim that something is incorrect. If e asserts something false in order to claim it incorrect, then e violates R2149 in so doing. If e simply asserts something true, then e violates R2149 by calling it a claim of error. -root
