Kerim Aydin wrote: >This is where we fundamentally disagree. Since dependent actions were >foolishly made a subclass of agoran decision, the reporting burden has >been ridiculously high and prone to error...
I don't disagree about this principle. I'm happy for the reporting requirements to be reduced; the present arrangement is quite cumbersome. I'm disagreeing specifically about reporting the implicit vote. Since we need the implicit vote, or some equivalent mechanism, to deal with partnerships, I think reporting it would be helpful in making sure it gets done right. >(at least, it worked smoothly for years). Note that in these years there weren't partnerships, so no need for a complication in dependent actions to cope with them. -zefram
