On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote: > I recognised that you intended to avoid that part of the reporting, and > I deliberately didn't include it in my version because I didn't think > that change worthwhile.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. Since dependent actions were foolishly made a subclass of agoran decision, the reporting burden has been ridiculously high and prone to error... this for something that used to work quite smoothly for "quick" actions and wasn't broken in any way (at least, it worked smoothly for years). -Goethe
