On Tuesday 29 January 2008 09:51:33 Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Zefram wrote: > > comex wrote: > >> Nevertheless, a standard Nomic game that made one rule completely > >> unamendable still deserves to be called a nomic. > > > > I'm not sure that it does. I think that's violating the fundamental > > concept of nomic. I think that the existence of entirely unamendable > > rules is a good criterion to distinguish between nomics and non-nomic > > rule systems. > > Why? If we passed a Power-4 Rule "This rule can't be changed or repealed, > and the creation of any system which can overrule this Rule is annulled > before taking effect" and we otherwise carried on as normal, we're still > as much of a nomic as we ever were. -Goethe
*echm* "To be nkeped" means to be removed from the ruleset. Rule UNCHANGABLE is hereby nkeped.
