root wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 2:56 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fix looks fine, but on a broader scale remind me why dependent actions
have to be a subclass of Agoran Decision at all (i.e., the reporting
requirements have been fairly burdensome of late). -Goethe
Because somebody thought it would be a good idea. I'm in favor of
divorcing them myself, but that's a different proposal.
Maud had the original idea, but I think I ended up writing the actual
proposal. I still kind of favor lightening the requirements (e.g.
SHOULD include all votes, but a correct announcement that the overall
count went your way is sufficient) without a full-on divorce.
