On Jan 17, 2008 2:18 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 17, 2008 2:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's messy, as each individual consent item can be resolved anytime > > between 4-14 days after intent. Now that offices are being contested > > again, maybe we should just go back to elections (perhaps with a fixed > > 4-day instead of week-long nomination period). Or maybe a hybrid, > > where only support/objections during that 4-day window are counted. > > I like the hybrid idea. When was the last time anybody voted on a > dependent action after the initial 4 days anyway?
Rule 107, however, does not like the hybrid idea. Also, it occurs to me that anybody could subvert the system by nominating and consenting just before the end of the 4 day period, denying everybody else the change to object. -root
