On Jan 12, 2008 12:26 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the rule in question hasn't changed at all since a month and a
> half before this case arose, I think it would be more accurate to call
> them the "imagined version" and the "actual version".
The whole "reckless" thing has changed quite a lot, if not recently.
Consider these former versions:
Rule 2149/2 (Power=1)
Truthfulness
A player SHALL NOT make a false statement in any public message
while knowing that the statement is false or being reckless as
to its veracity. Merely quoting a false statement does not
constitute making it for the purposes of this rule. Any
disclaimer, conditional clause, or other qualifier attached to a
statement constitutes part of the statement for the purposes of
this rule; the truth or falsity of the whole is what is
significant.
Rule 2149/0 (Power=1)
Truthfulness
Players are prohibited from deliberately or recklessly making
false statements in any public message. Merely quoting a false
statement does not constitute making it for the purposes of this
rule. Any disclaimer, conditional clause, or other qualifier
attached to a statement constitutes part of the statement for
the purposes of this rule; the truth or falsity of the whole is
what is significant.
