On 10/01/2008, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, so you believed your statement to not violate the version of the > rule you saw before. But then one could say that your belief didn't > apply to the current version.
Again, "if the defendant reasonably believed that the alleged act did not violate the specified rule". Rule 105/3, "Rule Changes", refers to "amend[ing] the text of a rule", and in other ways strongly suggests that after a rule is changed, it's still the same rule, and also says that rules cannot be changed in any other ways. Therefore, "the specified rule" is not the same as "the current version of the specified rule". --Ivan Hope CXXVII
