On Jan 10, 2008 10:30 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/9/08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > well, until you posted your judgment I did honestly believe that my > > actions were not in violation of R2149, largely because I hadn't > > reviewed the rule in quite some time and had forgotten exactly what it > > said. > > How can you believe that you are following a rule that you can't even > remember? >
Ah, because after reading that rule my mind stored a mental image of it's general concept: "Don't deliberately lie." Sarcasm typically doesn't fall under the category of lying, since the speaker's intent is typically clear. Therefore I thought I was in compliance with this rule. BobTHJ
