On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 6:24 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> CFJ statement: Players may always be referred to by eir legal name >> along with eir nickname. >> >> My initial thought: I don't see why not. >> >> At the moment, I'm inclined to rule FALSE due to the "always" >> absoluteness. > > Consider also the hypothetical case where two players share the same legal > name. But there is always a context under which a person's legal name can be referred to clearly, right Ian? Or is it Beverly? Other thought: "Legal name" in an Agoran CFJ means must refer to "legal in terms of Agora" and that means "Agoran name" which is necessarily unique which is legally trivial and not the statement intent but it's what it says. -G.
