On Jan 10, 2008 6:24 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CFJ statement: Players may always be referred to by eir legal name > along with eir nickname. > > My initial thought: I don't see why not. > > Thinking as I type: As long as it's clear. Kelly has been a > registered player multiple times. Ian was a registered player during > 2001. Referring to "Ian Kelly" may refer to either (aleph) past > players Ian and Kelly, or (bet) current player root, whose legal name > is Ian Kelly. So a potential ambiguity exists. > > At the moment, I'm inclined to rule FALSE due to the "always" > absoluteness.
Consider also the hypothetical case where two players share the same legal name. -root
