On Dec 26, 2007 12:34 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 December 2007 12:30:49 Roger Hicks wrote: > > On Dec 26, 2007 12:28 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A voting system without bribery, or selling of votes, being essential to a > > > well-functioning democratic system, > > > I submit the following proposal (AI=2): > > > "Bribery" > > > Create the following rule (power=2): > > > A vote on a democratic proposal MAY NOT be influenced by any > person via the > > > transfer of currency or assets, or via any threat, or via any > exchange of > > > useful goods. > > > > > Hmm... I'm pretty strongly AGAINST this, although I suppose my vote > > can be sold for the right price. > > > > BobTHJ > > > > Note that I want that only on democratic proposals. If we decide to allow > democratic proposals to be manipulated in that way, we may as well eliminate > the distinction, and just allow partnerships to vote. . . Or the average > player to vote *4 to *12,000 on them. > Surely you'll agree that that is not in the best interests of the game? > > Perhaps...let me give it some thought.
BobTHJ
