On Wednesday 26 December 2007 14:04:00 comex wrote: > On Wednesday 26 December 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote: > > A voting system without bribery, or selling of votes, being essential to > > a well-functioning democratic system, > > I submit the following proposal (AI=2): > > "Bribery" > > Create the following rule (power=2): > > A vote on a democratic proposal MAY NOT be influenced by any person > > via the transfer of currency or assets, or via any threat, or via any > > exchange of useful goods. > > A ruleset without misformatted, untitled, unenforcable rules being > essential to a well-functioning Nomic, > I submit the following proposal (AI=4): > "Awful Proposals" > Create the following rule (power=2) titled "Awful Proposals": > A proposal SHALL NOT be submitted if it is truly, horrifically > awful. Any player may, without two objections, deem a proposal > awful. >
Misformatting is your fault, not mine (and irrelevant, anyways). Untitled is irrelevant (although perhaps a tiny bit of a pain to the rulekeeper). Unenforcable is a good point, though. . . Actions in the game which are bribery, however, can clearly been seen and such bribery can be charged against.
