PROTO JUDGEMENT in CFJ 1845:
R1504 lays out the requirements for initiating a criminal case:
a) The identity of the defendant.
b) Exactly one rule allegedly breached by the defendant.
c) The action (which may be a failure to perform another action)
by which the defendant allegedly breached this rule.
Let's walk through these.
a) comex identified BobTHJ as the defendant. PASS
b) comex referred to R2149 in eir arguments, and presented no other
rule in the message as provided to this CFJ. I consider this to
adequately identify the rule in question (although not as clearly as
I might prefer). PASS
c) comex stated the action in question (namely, that the defendant,
as a knight, publishing a statement that e believed to be false). PASS
Whether the rule identified in the alleged breach is applicable to
the action in question is a matter for the relevant trial judge to
determine, and is outside the scope of this inquiry. As comex's
message met the requirements for a criminal CFJ, I proto-judge TRUE.
(Murphy owes the Oracle four pieces of fluff and any hand tool.)
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
