On Tuesday 04 December 2007 21:36:30 Ed Murphy wrote: > pikhq wrote: > > > The contract, by my interpretation, was formed when you submitted the contract > > to H. Notary Goethe (since I said "I will agree to this if you submit this > > private contract to the Notary.") By this interpretation, the contract was > > formed at 01:11, 2007-11-28. > > Agreed. Just so long as the judge agrees, we're set. > > > I submitted my CFJ at 01:14, 2007-11-29, *after* > > you had violated the agreement's time limit. > > The time limit started when you transferred Marks to me, so it was > still a whopping 24 seconds away from expiring when you called the > equity case. 24 *seconds*? Ow. > > Now that I take another look, though, Rule 2169 doesn't limit the > judge to examining the gamestate at the time the case was called. > This makes it a very *interesting* test case. :)
> > I remind you that I still don't have my marks. > > It wouldn't be much of a test case if you did, now would it? > > Granted.
