On Tuesday 04 December 2007 20:00:39 Zefram wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > >At the time CFJ 1811 was called, I had not violated an agreement to > >perform the indicated transfer within a given time limit. > > JOOI, are there any parties to the agreement in question other than pikhq > and you? No one has actually made an explicit statement on this issue, > so I've been wondering the whole time whether (for example) my assignment > of the case to comex was valid. > > -zefram >
There were other, similar contracts, I'm told, which may have involved comex, but *this* contract does not have comex in it.
