On 10/31/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/31/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/30/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Additionally, in programming, objects belong to > > > only one subclass. I find, therefore, that an individual case can only > > > belong to one subclass. > > > > http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/82412.html > > I was speaking in generalities. Considering some random person's > (admittedly very interesting) extension to general practice is > thoroughly out of scope.
As, I think, is analogy to OOP to begin with. -root
