On 10/30/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The crux of this is the definition of "subclass". Unfortunately, the > only version of "subclass" I found in the dictionary is the biological > one. It is worth noting that for the biological "subclass", a species > belongs to only one. Additionally, in programming, objects belong to > only one subclass. I find, therefore, that an individual case can only > belong to one subclass. > What about multiple inheritance?
BobTHJ
