On 10/31/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/30/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Additionally, in programming, objects belong to
> > only one subclass. I find, therefore, that an individual case can only
> > belong to one subclass.
>
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/82412.html
I was speaking in generalities. Considering some random person's
(admittedly very interesting) extension to general practice is
thoroughly out of scope.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
