comex wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007, Zefram wrote:
It's also an open question whether a non-unanimous voting process for
amendment (such as the rules have) is compatible with R1742.
Primo Corporation's existence makes CFJing on this easy...
R1742 never says that its method is the only way to amend the
contract, but it may be the only one that Agora formally
recognizes. Another possible interpretation is that the
members are indirectly in unanimous agreement to abide by the
outcome of the non-unanimous voting process (R1742 should
probably be amended to make this explicit).
