On 10/22/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian Kelly wrote: > >To what rules and behavior are you referring? > > The rules impose obligations on non-players, which is inconsistent with > them being a contract with the players as the set of parties. (An amended > version of R2171 that widens the notional set of parties would run into > trouble with the application of R101(iv) and R101(v) in such cases.)
Point. > The rules don't terminate if there are fewer than two players. The agreement to follow them does, unless we decide that we can after all have agreements with a single party. -root
