On 10/22/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 22 October 2007, Zefram wrote: > > It's also an open question whether a non-unanimous voting process for > > amendment (such as the rules have) is compatible with R1742. > > Primo Corporation's existence makes CFJing on this easy...
By CFJ 1659 and the fact that no Primo votes have been held on the public forum, the Primo Corporation agreement has never been amended in the eyes of Agora anyway. -root
