comex wrote: > I don't think the fallacy is legal or logical; I believe it's Goethe > et al's grammatical fallacy that "I vote FOR" is not a statement.
There is no et al. It is all myself. I may have mispoke, it is strictly speaking a "statement", but it is not a statement that can be meaningfully assigned a truth value under the current legal system, therefore it is neither a "true statement" nor a "false statement" under the current rules. > It's still a statement; it just so happens that the game makes the > statement ipso facto true. You confuse cause and effect. The game doesn't make the statement itself "true", the statement makes the game condition true, if the game allows. -Goethe
