Ed Murphy wrote: >5171 AGAINST (invisible F) Ah, you're in the "unless" == "iff not" camp too? Curious. I had no idea that interpretation of "unless" existed in formal logic. I've always used it to mean "if not".
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >5171 AGAINST (invisible F) Ah, you're in the "unless" == "iff not" camp too? Curious. I had no idea that interpretation of "unless" existed in formal logic. I've always used it to mean "if not".
-zefram