On Thursday 16 August 2007, Pavitra wrote:
> > 3) While we're at it, I think we should forbid inactive players from
> > performing dependent actions in general.
> None whatsoever. I agree with 3) as well.
But it's just this kind of loophole that could potentially lead to a 
magnificent scam.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.



Reply via email to