Kerim Aydin wrote: > These orders would be legal, binding by the contract, >and appealable/upholdable in Agoran law. Enforcement, of course, would >always be an issue.
I still fail to see the difference you're claiming between the Civil CFJ system and the present system. Under the present system an arbitration order issued by a pre-agreed arbitration service can have legal force, binding via contract. R1742 obliges parties to obey the orders, where they have contractually agreed to, and violation of those orders is then a rule violation that can be punished by the rule-mandated penalties, ultimately chokey and exile which are the only enforcable punishments. Arbitration is equally binding, legally, in either case. The arbitrative decisions are equally enforcable in either case. What am I missing? -zefram
