[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Has there been any CFJs on what counts as allowing "Agora unrestricted >access to make changes" to a Protectorate's ruleset?
No. You could call one: CFJing is not restricted to players. >Agora certainly has the potential to make any change to any part of >the ruleset of PHAPN. "Sure you can change my rules, as long as you can guess the password!". I don't think that's sufficiently cooperative. You have a rule saying that Agora is allowed to change the rules, but that doesn't make it true. You not only have to define a procedure, but it has to be reasonably possible for Agora to deliberately initiate that procedure. If the method is secret, you're not in practice allowing Agora to change the rules. -zefram
