On 6/20/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/20/07, Levi Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Repeal Rule 2142
>
> Modify Rule 106 by replacing the following text:
> (This might have to be changed depending on other proposals)
>
> The adoption index of a proposal is an integral multiple of 0.1,
> with a default and minimum value of 1.0. Before the Promotor
> distributes a proposal, its proposer may modify its adoption
> index by announcement. A Proposal with an Adoption Index of 1
> is Ordinary. All other Proposals are Democratic.
>
> with the follwoing
>
> The adoption index of a proposal is an integral multiple of 0.1,
> with a default and minimum value of 1.0. Before the Promotor
> distributes a proposal, its proposer may modify its adoption
> index by announcement.
>
> A Proposal with an Adoption Index of less than 2 is Ordinary
> by default.
> All other Proposals are Democratic.
>
> An Ordinary proposal may be made Democratic by any player
> during its voting period With 3 Supporters.
There's a subtle issue here that we've run into before. The default
AI is 1, and the default chamber for that AI is Ordinary. Thus the
default chamber for a proposal is Ordinary. When the proposer then
modifies the proposal's adoption index to 2 or 3, the proposal remains
Ordinary because that default has already been applied.
Actually, the wording "All other Proposals are Democratic" (as opposed
to, e.g., "All other Proposals are Democratic by default") probably
makes it work in this case, now that I've thought on it a bit longer.
It's not clear what the result would be if the proposer changed the AI
to 2 and then back to 1, though. There was a period when we only
allowed the proposer to *increase* the AI in order to deal with issues
like this.
-root