On 6/20/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Kelly wrote:
> The ballot allotment time of a proposal of which the chamber
The term "chamber" is no longer defined. Would be clearer if you
define it.
Whoops.
>Increase the power of Rule 2142 to 2, and amend it by
>replacing the text "1.1" with "2".
Been thinking about this. Kicking a proposal up to needing a 2/3
supermajority is an awfully big change. Might be better to decouple
chamber from AI a bit. Thus a concerned VLOP-minority could make the
proposal Democratic but leave its AI at 1 or whatever it was.
I've been thinking the same thing, but I'm lazy and didn't want to
have to resort to something like "A proposal with AI less than 2 is
ordinary unless another rule indicates otherwise." Not a big deal,
though.
-root
