On 6/14/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As the current Contracts rule requires proposals to amend contracts, it doesn't offer that benefit. Also, the current Contracts rule doesn't allow much in resolving conflicts between Contracts and Rules. I think a compromise is hard-coding each contract's relationship with the rules by name in its own rule, and getting rid of generic contracts (in this case, the Envoy just becomes a single rule).
That's a good point. My main objection to repealing ACs is the eventual possibility of having to repeat all the work we did on Cardbooks, but the AC rule doesn't seem to contain much of that anyway. So I guess I'm not all that attached to the AC rule after all. -root
