Zefram wrote:
As I interpret it, the judgement of CFJ 1669 means that proposal 4939, which we thought was a legal distribution of Murphy's "Re-divide some offices" proposal, was actually not a legal distribution. Murphy's proposal is presumably still in the proposal pool. What about the purported resolution of the Agoran decision on P4939? Was there really an Agoran decision there? Does R2034 mean that we successfully adopted an unsubmitted proposal?
The only difference was the spurious line break in Rule 2139, right? I just went back and checked my local message store; neither the submission nor the purported distribution contained the spurious line break, and (after stripping out the variable amount of blank space at the beginning of each line) 'diff' found no differences between the two texts.
