As I interpret it, the judgement of CFJ 1669 means that proposal 4939, which we thought was a legal distribution of Murphy's "Re-divide some offices" proposal, was actually not a legal distribution. Murphy's proposal is presumably still in the proposal pool. What about the purported resolution of the Agoran decision on P4939? Was there really an Agoran decision there? Does R2034 mean that we successfully adopted an unsubmitted proposal?
-zefram
