Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:e) A player may, with Agoran consent with a consent index of H/L, perform an action and cause a rule with Power L to take precedence over a rule with Power H with regard to that action. E must be otherwise permitted to perform that action, taking the altered precedence into account.Sounds dangerous. We have relied on the power-based precedence relationships in drafting high-power rules.
Which is why allowing e.g. a Power=1 rule to temporarily trump a Power=3 rule would require >= 3/4 support on a case-by-case basis.
