Michael Slone wrote: >repeal rules 1688, 1482, and 1030. Do you intend there to be no precedence mechanism at all? And what about supermajority voting?
-zefram
Michael Slone wrote: >repeal rules 1688, 1482, and 1030. Do you intend there to be no precedence mechanism at all? And what about supermajority voting?
-zefram