Zefram wrote: > Proposal proliferation is a good thing in a parliamentary nomic. It is > the very basis of the game.
I do not have time to wade through the implications of a dozen ill-conceived and clashing proposals in a single distribution. If I stay, I feel the need so review them, lest one of them put me in a box (e.g. like I was during CFJs 1413-1417). The basis of the parliamentary nomic is parliamentary procedure, not unfettered access to pure democracy (e.g. mob rule). This is the main reason I just deregistered. > > At the very least, we should charge for raising AI to 1.1, > > currently a free end-run around the ordinary. > > On the contrary, that's (at least temporarily) an essential safeguard > for democracy. Why does the phrase "it's just a temporary safeguard for democracy" make me feel uneasy? -Goethe
