Kerim Aydin wrote: >I would hardly call the period in 2001-2002 when we charged for >proposals to be stagnation.
There was an earlier period too. It sucked. > Rather, I would call the free proposal >period "ill-considered proliferation". Proposal proliferation is a good thing in a parliamentary nomic. It is the very basis of the game. >At the very least, we should charge for raising AI to 1.1, >currently a free end-run around the ordinary. On the contrary, that's (at least temporarily) an essential safeguard for democracy. -zefram
