> -----Original Message----- > From: Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com> > > Challenging a la Haramein? No doubt. But that is what the adventure is all > about. Have we managed to wrap our minds fully round the implications of > Mandelbrot's contribution? And then, there is so much else of science to > revisit once the context of an AGI has been adequately " boundaried".
Cheers to Mandelbrot not only for the math and science but for the great related art and culture. and music even! Fractal music 😊 > Imagine if "we" could engineer that (to develop an ingenious consciousness- > based engine), which the vast majority of researchers claim cannot be done? > Except for lack of specific knowledge and knowhow and an inadequate > resource base (for now), I see no sound reason why such a feat would not be > possible. Big project 😊 IMO successful AGI will use consciousness functionally but won't call it that since it causes so much hyperventilation. Researchers want non-conscious AGI so it doesn't go rogue LOL. Hmmm wonder about that. Could non-conscious go rogue anyway... and is non-conscious even possible. John ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T59bc38b5f7062dbd-M35cefe5ab69cf35542a85d92 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
