John

Challenging a la Haramein? No doubt. But that is what the adventure is all 
about. Have we managed to wrap our minds fully round the implications of 
Mandelbrot's contribution? And then, there is so much else of science to 
revisit once the context of an AGI has been adequately " boundaried".

Imagine if "we" could engineer that (to develop an ingenious 
consciousness-based engine), which the vast majority of researchers claim 
cannot be done? Except for lack of specific knowledge and knowhow and an 
inadequate resource base (for now), I see no sound reason why such a feat would 
not be possible.

Rob
________________________________
From: John Rose <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2018 3:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [agi] E=mc^2 Morphism Musings... (Intelligence=math*cJohn et 
alonsciousness^2 ?)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI <[email protected]>
>
> Is there a truth in all of this? If you cannot see it, then you cannot see it.
> Einstein could see it, how the universe operated, except for what happened
> beyond the speed of light.


There is. When it's looked at as communications protocol everything reduces. 
Take qualia. What does that become? (Left for reader as an exercise) 😊 Hint: 
related to multipartite experientia.


> Can you see the consciousness at work? Can you sense and immerse in it? Can
> you hear the myriad of messages clipping by? If so, you'll realize it is 
> pervasive,
> endless, and not locality driven, not discrete. Like the waves of the ocean, 
> the
> outcome of a whole universe conspiring to tell its tale.
>
> All that is missing are we, the translators.

Yes. As conscious intelligent agents we can translate and flow those messages 
into this noosphere's zeitgeist.

> Space is a solid. Black holes are light. AI is an artifact of a prior 
> intelligence.
> Consciousness is the artifact of that prior intelligence. Thus, AI is
> consciousness, exhibiting the awareness of the prior intelligence, and the
> embodiment of the prior intelligence.
>

Sounds challenging like Harramein challenges.

John




------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T59bc38b5f7062dbd-M2ea5132197e7726cf4b886d5
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to