I would call that just being a good company.  Stakeholder capitalism as
defined in the book also tries to make climate change people and water
conservation people and social justice people all happy.   The pursuit of
global ESG ratings drove many companies toward low profits.  

 

They are mostly abandoning that type of stakeholder capitalism and reverting
to Milton Freedman.  Nothing wrong with being straight up capitalist and
taking good care of your employees.  

 

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 8:08 AM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT good book

 

So what's that book's take on Stakeholder capitalism?  

 

We had a company called Endicott-Johnson in our area that was the main
employer for the whole region.  Endicott-Johnson made shoes, and vertically
integrated, so they also owned cattle farms, tanneries, and everything else
in the supply chain.  The whole economy of the county was built around them.
They made army boots for WWI and WWII.  

 

Endicott-Johnson didn't want to deal with unions so they figured the best
thing to do was take care of everyone so they wouldn't feel like they need a
union.  They had good pay and benefits, helped employees build houses,
funded public pools, public parks and rec, and so forth.  Basically, it was
Stakeholder capitalism before it had that name.  I like the idea because it
has a positive history in this area.

 

Unfortunately, EJ was bought by LL Bean in the 70's and production moved to
Kentucky or something. You can imagine what a kick in the groin it was to
lose that regional economic engine.

 

-Adam

 

 

  _____  

From: AF on behalf of Chuck McCown
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 1:05 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: [AFMUG] OT good book 

 

https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Last-Call-for-Bud-Light/Anson-Frerick
s/9781668070901

 

I understand ESG/DEI much better now.  Odd business philosophy that took
over for a short period.  Stakeholder vs Shareholder duty of care for
corporate governance.  It all reverts back to Adam Smith and the Wealth of
Nations.  Nothing new under the sun. 

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to