I assume nobody drank Budweiser for the taste, so it must have been 100% the 
power of image and advertising.

 

“This Bud’s for you.”  Seriously, take it, I’m not going to drink that 
dishwater.  Or is it Clydesdale pee?

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 2:30 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT good book

 

Yep and they dropped Dylan without as much as a sorry or thank you once the 
$hit hit the fan.  

 

From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 1:25 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com 
<mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT good book

 

Not going to comment or offer opinion, but just to clarify the facts.  My 
recollection is the Budweiser boycott was in response to an advertising 
partnership with Dylan Mulvaney.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dylan_Mulvaney

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> > On Behalf 
Of Darin Steffl
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 1:43 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT good book

 

Does the book cover how uneducated many bigots are in America? Does it explain 
why some people on the right are scared of everything different? Does it 
explain how a trans person drinking beer doesn't negatively affect any "normal" 
beer drinker?

 

>From what I can gather, a trans person posted a Bud Light promotion/ad on 
>their Instagram to attract younger customers then conservative snowflakes 
>boycotted Bud Light? Is that the general consensus of why conservatives 
>participated in cancel culture? I thought they were against cancel culture?

 

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025, 12:07 PM Chuck McCown <ch...@go-mtc.com 
<mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com> > wrote:

https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Last-Call-for-Bud-Light/Anson-Frericks/9781668070901

 

I understand ESG/DEI much better now.  Odd business philosophy that took over 
for a short period.  Stakeholder vs Shareholder duty of care for corporate 
governance.  It all reverts back to Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations.  
Nothing new under the sun.  

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to