I know that when we built sites in NJ within the borders of where the pinelands 
commission had jurisdiction, we would not pour pads, the cabinets were placed 
on fiberglass/plastic mats/pads. The rationale was that so long as there was no 
ground disturbances, the Pinelands commission had to say in the site 
development. The cabinet was looked at as a non-permanent fixture/device. 

 

Thank you,

Brian Webster

www.wirelessmapping.com

 

From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 12:03 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Property Tax

 

A related question on property tax:

Has anyone ever had the tax man hit you for a cabinet on a concrete pad?  It 
has been suggested to me that a cabinet might not attract as much attention 
from an assessor as a building.

 

-Adam

 

  _____  

From: Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:26 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Property Tax 

 

Ah...."personal property tax".  A new vocabulary word for me, and that has 
clarified the question greatly.  Also called "Tangible Personal Property" tax 
or "Business Personal Property" tax.  New York State is on a short list of 
states that don't have this type of tax so I was not familiar with it.  If I 
build a tower on leased land in NY it will count as a permanent improvement to 
the underlying land, so the property owner sees the tax increase and that has 
to be built into the rent negotiation.

 

Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania don't have a 
TPP or BPP.  

Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, and South Dakota only have 
them on select industries.  NJ, for example, only has it on petroleum refining 
and on the LEC.  Sucks to be Verizon in NJ.

 

The rest of the states have more general TPP or BPP.  This affects site 
acquisition in different states.  Thanks for feedback, everyone.

 

-Adam

 

 

  _____  

From: AF on behalf of Tushar Patel
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 7:37 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Cc: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Property Tax 

 

In Texas we get personal property tax on the assets. 

So, cell tower is an asset so in Texas, I should say a few counties we are in 
we get tax bill for it.

 

 

Tushar 

 

 

On Mar 18, 2025, at 1:39 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

I'm seeing two cell phone towers on land owned by a fire department.  The 
parcel info shows zero tax because obviously the fire department is tax exempt, 
and they do not show a separate parcel for the cell towers.

 

I know it depends on the local laws, but is it likely the cell phone companies 
are getting a free ride on the property tax by placing on tax exempt property?  
If that's an avenue for tax avoidance, then I'm all about it.  I'll do it all 
day long.

I'm just wondering if anyone has experience with that.  Could the tax man make 
it some special case where they bill the cell phone company separately?

 

-Adam

 

--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to