Isn't that a show with all women? I don't much about them (women) they confuse me greatly even the three females I live with. I also know there is some confuse about what defines a woman, but I thought the one of the undisputed things was they are never wrong.


On 2/17/25 1:24 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Best to pop some palomitos, sit back and enjoy the show. I love the nuts on both sides when their heads explode.  I do wish “The View” would eventually admit they are wrong about something, anything.  Just one thing
*From:* Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Monday, February 17, 2025 1:07 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DOGE website (www.doge.gov)
"we are getting pretty close to the end of the income tax so long as people shut off the news and quit being told what to think."
Cool, as long as they do something about the spending too.
The "he's got our data" stuff is rather alarmist.  A lot of people have that same data.  Owning a company based on targeted advertising, he might already know more about you than the government does. "he's unelected" is a statement simplified for dummies.  The question is why should we trust THIS unelected guy with no senate confirmation, but NOT trust the unelected, unconfirmed people at the GAO and OIG?  I haven't yet received an answer from anyone I've asked this question to, so I /assume /the answer is that people are willing to believe him because of his political affiliation, or because he's saying what they want to hear.  I'm ready to be educated if there's a better answer to that.
-Adam
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Monday, February 17, 2025 1:03 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DOGE website (www.doge.gov)
Clinton pretty well did it, and balanced the budget on paper and Obama formed doge, so they both did their part. transparency is a pretty gender fluid word these days. means entirely different things to different people. we are getting pretty close to the end of the income tax so long as people shut off the news and quit being told what to think. hand out queens (many in this industry for sure) and the gimme gimmes are scared, rightfully so, and the grifters are petrified, even more rightfully so, lynch every one of them. "he's unelected" "he's got our data" - the battle cry of morons or the propaganda of those who love their morons. I hope RFK does the right thing and comes out against huffing sarin gas and drinking ricin slushies. The demand for sarin and castor beans will be through the roof with that media push and the course will correct. then we just need somebody to get the rumor out that oxygen makes you gay, belt and lemon sales will skyrocket and right that ship too.
the level of mental retardation we are witnessing is astounding.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 8:13 AM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

    I just saw a video of both Clinton and Obama saying they'd do what
    DOGE is doing, but they seemingly just paid lip service to it. I
    do want it to be more transparent, but I also want them to keep going.




    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
    To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
    Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 8:00:49 AM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DOGE website (www.doge.gov <http://www.doge.gov>)



    A better question is why do we have to take their word for it when
    it's spent?
    The good, final outcome of this is there is a framework in place
    now for all future spending to be on public record in a clear and
    transparent manner, publicly accessible, with the spend requests
    and links to the outcome reports. That should t require foia


    My guess is half of what they claw back will ultimately be paid
    out when it's explained and justified.


    On Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 7:23 AM Adam Moffett < dmmoff...@gmail.com >
    wrote:







    Steve,


    An example I just saw on doge.gov <http://doge.gov> was an $8mil
    USDA contract with a screen shot of a record. Nothing on the
    screen demonstrates how it was waste, fraud, or abuse. The title
    of the contract was some fluffy sounding thing about environmental
    compliance, and as far as I can tell the title is what we’re
    supposed to accept as evidence. That was an example from the day’s
    “batch” with no information provided about whatever else was
    canceled that day.


    Maybe they’ll publish more details later for “maximal
    transparency”, but right now we are forced to take their word for it.


    It’s fair to have a problem with unelected bureaucrats wielding
    most of the power of the federal government, but the same should
    not become OK just because the bureaucrat is an ideologically
    appropriate apparatchik.






    Get Outlook for iOS

    From: AF < af-boun...@af.afmug.com > on behalf of Steve Jones <
    thatoneguyst...@gmail.com >
    Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2025 9:41:06 PM
    To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group < af@af.afmug.com >
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DOGE website ( www.doge.gov
    <http://www.doge.gov> )


    yeah, super scary. boogeyman level


    On Sat, Feb 15, 2025, 6:17 PM Jason McKemie <
    j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > wrote:



    This seems about par for the course with these guys. Scary stuff.


    I love how this administration uses the term "maximally
    transparent", or some derivation thereof everywhere they can. I
    guess if you say it enough, it must be true, right?


    On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 5:59 PM Ken Hohhof < khoh...@kwom.com > wrote:







    https://www.wired.com/story/doge-website-is-just-one-big-x-ad/



    DOGE’s Website Is Just One Big X Ad

    The source code for the new Department of Government Efficiency’s
    “official US government website” points to X as its primary source
    of authority, while sharing links to the site sends users to x.com
    <http://x.com> .



    At a press conference in the Oval Office this week, Elon Musk
    promised the actions of his so-called Department of Government
    Efficiency (DOGE) project would be “maximally transparent,” thanks
    to information posted to its website.

    At the time of his comment, the DOGE website was empty . However,
    when the site finally came online Thursday morning, it turned out
    to be little more than a glorified feed of posts from the official
    DOGE account on Musk’s own X platform, raising new questions about
    Musk’s conflicts of interest in running DOGE .

    DOGE.gov claims to be an “official website of the United States
    government,” but rather than giving detailed breakdowns of the
    cost savings and efficiencies Musk claims his project is making,
    the homepage of the site just replicated posts from the DOGE
    account on X.

    A WIRED review of the page’s source code shows that the promotion
    of Musk’s own platform went deeper than replicating the posts on
    the homepage. The source code shows that the site’s canonical tags
    direct search engines to x.com <http://x.com> rather than DOGE.gov.

    A canonical tag is a snippet of code that tells search engines
    what the authoritative version of a website is. It is typically
    used by sites with multiple pages as a search engine optimization
    tactic, to avoid their search ranking being diluted.

    In DOGE’s case, however, the code is informing search engines that
    when people search for content found on DOGE.gov, they should not
    show those pages in search results, but should instead display the
    posts on X.

    “It is promoting the X account as the main source, with the
    website secondary,” Declan Chidlow, a web developer , tells WIRED.
    “This isn't usually how things are handled, and it indicates that
    the X account is taking priority over the actual website itself.”

    Advertisement

    All the other US government websites WIRED checked used their own
    homepage in their canonical tags, including the official White
    House website. Additionally, when sharing the DOGE website on
    mobile devices, the source code creates a link to the DOGE X
    account rather than the website itself.

    “It seems that the DOGE website is secondary, and they are
    prodding people in the direction of the X account everywhere they
    can,” Chidlow adds.

    Alongside the homepage feed of X posts, a section of Doge.gov
    labeled “Savings” now appears. So far the page is empty except for
    a single line that reads: “Receipts coming soon, no later than
    Valentine's day,” followed by a heart emoji .

    A section entitled “Workforce” features some bar charts showing
    how many people work in each government agency, with the
    information coming from data gathered by the Office of Personnel
    Management in March 2024.

    A disclaimer at the bottom of the page reads: “This is DOGE's
    effort to create a comprehensive, government-wide org chart. This
    is an enormous effort, and there are likely some errors or
    omissions. We will continue to strive for maximum accuracy over time.”

    Another section, entitled “Regulations,” features what DOGE calls
    the “Unconstitutionality Index,” which it describes as “the number
    of agency rules created by unelected bureaucrats for each law
    passed by Congress in 2024.”

    The charts in this section are also based on data previously
    collected by US government agencies. Doge.gov also links to a
    Forbes article from last month that was written by Clyde Wayne
    Crews, a member of the Heartland Institute, a conservative think
    tank that pushed climate change disinformation and questioned the
    links between tobacco and lung cancer . It is also a major
    advocate for privatizing government departments .

    The site also features a “Join” page which allows prospective DOGE
    employees to apply for roles including “software engineers,
    InfoSec engineers, and other technology professionals.” As well as
    requesting a Github account and résumé, the form asks visitors to
    “provide 2-3 bullet points showcasing exceptional ability.”

    The website does not list a developer, but on Wednesday, web
    application security expert Sam Curry outlined in a thread on X
    how he was able to identify the developer of the site as DOGE
    employee Kyle Shutt.

    Curry claims he was able to link a Cloudflare account ID found in
    the site’s source code to Shutt, who used the same account when
    developing Musk’s America PAC website.

    On Thursday, Drop Site News reported, citing sources within FEMA,
    that Shutt had gained access to the agency’s proprietary software
    controlling payments. Earlier this week, Business Insider reported
    that Shutt, who recently worked at an AI interviewing software
    company, was listed as one of 30 people working for DOGE.

    Neither Shutt, DOGE, nor the White House responded to requests for
    comment.

    --
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
    --
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
    --
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    --
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


    --
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to