I suspect once upon a time the FCC (and its predecessor the Federal Radio 
Commission) focused on technical and administrative duties, kind of like the 
FAA. It seems to have undergone major mission creep. Into social, political and 
cultural issues. It's not obvious that radio spectrum licensing should be 
political.I'm also not sure it's a good thing they are funded entirely by 
regulatory fees. Does that include fines. Or do those go to the US Treasury? 
Their enforcement actions seem to always be fines. Which for a small WISP can 
be an existential threat, but for a big corporation are just the cost of doing 
business.From my perspective, their job is to require a bunch of paperwork, 
then fine you if you don't do the paperwork right and on time. Actually doing 
the equivalent of making sure the trains run on time, not so much. And every 
time the POTUS party changes, we get jerked around. Net neutrality is in. No, 
it's out. Now it's back. Then it isn't. ---- Original Message ----From: "Tyson 
Burris" Sent: 11/20/2024 9:11:21 AMTo: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new FCC boss







After two decades in the wireless internet service provider (WISP) industry, 
it?s become clear to me that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) hasn?t 
exactly been our
 biggest supporter. While we often exchange polite handshakes and warm smiles, 
these gestures rarely translate into the substantial changes we need for the 
long-term health of our industry as we aren?t giving away houses in return.

?
Sure, there are occasional offerings from the FCC, but they often fall short of 
giving us something to truly celebrate. It feels like we?re all caught up in a 
game?while they
 play by their own set of rules, we?re doing our best to navigate the 
landscape. Despite the challenges, we continue to adapt and innovate, always 
hopeful for a future where our needs are genuinely recognized and addressed.
?
Don?t bet on any side being your bestie.

?




Tyson Burris?
President & CEO?


?




Internet Communications Inc (ICI)
739 Commerce Dr. Franklin, IN 46131?
?
317-412-1540
 (emergency/after-hours)?
317-738-0320?(office)

 ?t...@franklinisp.net?
??www.surfici.net?
?





?
Fixed Wireless Broadband - PtP/PtMP Solutions ? Indoor/Oudoor Wifi - IP Cameras 
- Fiber ? MDUs ?
?
Active Member To The Following:
?
WISPA
NBBC
?
Confidentiality Notice:

?
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the intended
 recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from 
your system.
?
No Binding Agreement:
?
This email is not a binding agreement or contract of any kind, unless it 
specifically states otherwise and expressly refers to a duly authorized 
agreement signed by both parties.
 Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of mine alone 
and do not necessarily represent those of the company. If you have any doubts 
about the validity or enforceability of any agreement or arrangement discussed 
in this email, please
 consult with an attorney.

?


From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com>
On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 11:26 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new FCC boss


?
Well, Carr is the actual author of the FCC portion of Project 25, so he's 
pretty much written what he would intend to do. According to the commentary 
printed in Newsweek 
(https://www.newsweek.com/brendan-carr-trump-fcc-pick-project-2025-chapter-1987413),
 he would have 4 main priorities:


Rein in big tech
Promote National Security
Unleash economic prosperity
Ensure FCC accountability and good governence
So there is little to nothing in the bullet points that mention the little guy. 
I would expect he would ignore the little guy.
The national security part is a non-specific reference to killing Tiktok.
The economic prosperity is a direct boost to Starlink (and is mentioned by name 
in Project 25).
The accountability part indicates that he wants more transparency, and I think 
that is a good thing.
?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 11/18/2024 10:55 AM, Dev wrote:


So what will Carr do for/against the little guys? 
?




-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to