I get a kick out of them thinking they can steer a hurricane. I could see some group figuring out some mechanism to trigger a hurricane at some point, thats not outside the realm of possible (though i think it would require a hurricane just suddenly being there, not the natural formation we watch occur) But they think the "powers that be" are steering these things. Like theres some drone pilot in quantico in a bunker driving it looking for red hats in the satellite feed to cripple
That being said, if also tomorrow a leak occurred and some governmental entity was creating hurricanes and steering them at red hats, I also wouldnt be shocked outside the massive scientific bound. Oddly enough, most of the people that believe the gocart hurricane theories are also christians, who dont even consider that the creator, with a history of smiting, might just be smiting, not much of the worlds population isnt in needs of a good smite On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:21 AM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote: > I have many friends and acquaintances that love them a good conspiracy > theory. I am not given to any conspiracies. > > Today the subject was HAARP. (Defunct research project to attempt > ionospheric heating). I was actually tangentially associated with HAARP > for a while. > > Being a life long ham the prospect of creating a patch of ionosphere that > could reflect HF signals any time of the day or night was very exciting. > The problem is, it never worked. They learned a whole bunch about the > upper atmosphere but the initial promise never worked out. But wow, is > there a group believing that the guvmnt can control the weather. Yes, they > can with cloud seeding etc but not with HAARP. And control is not really a > good word, more like influence. > > I try to speak reason, share some facts, always falls on deaf ears. > HAARP was heating the ionosphere. There ain’t no weather up there. > Weather is in the troposphere. > Troposcatter can inject a bit of energy in the troposphere but it is 100 > times higher frequencies and produces no noticeable increase in > temperature. > > Here is a fact: Warmer air can hold more moisture. Something like 7% per > degree. Don’t recall if that was F or C. > > If you could selectively and effectively heat the atmosphere with > something like radiowaves interesting things could happen. Even nefarious > things. So far, no system has been demonstrated. Inverse square law > governs. If you calculate the specific heat of a large enough volume of > air (Like a sphere 20 miles in diameter) the amount of energy needed for > the transmitters would be on the scale of several nuclear powered aircraft > carriers to power the transmitter. Better just to launch small nukes with > cloud seeding fall out. > > Here is another fact: For as long as there have been thermometers, humans > have been keeping a record of temperatures. Some of those old thermometers > actually survived so that their inaccuracies could be characterized and > their records could be adjusted to modern standards. > > Here is another fact: All the records indicate a non linear increase in > temperatures. > > So circle back to the beginning, warmer air == more moisture in the air. > More moisture in the air makes clouds which make storms and rain. > > Occam's Razor. > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
