I've never understood politicians "pandering to the base". The base sure as 
shit isn't going to vote for the other person, so maybe they should pander to 
the middle? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> 
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 8:42:51 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] intersection of technical and political 


I once heard a comment from some talking head political muckity muck that the 
difference since 2016 is that Donald Trump demonstrated that the extremes are 
more motivated to vote, and since then our politicians have been speaking to 
those groups. What they're saying may not match what they do because some of 
them are simply opportunists rather than true believers. Ted Cruz would be one 
example (among many). Look at his positions before the 2016 election, and then 
look at things he says now. I don't think he's gotten more extreme, I just 
think he's saying things that he thinks a reliable voting block will like. 


I've also gotten a bit cynical about the whole thing. Thinking back, I can 
remember people talking about zillions of people crossing our southern border 
all the way back to my childhood (1980's). It's a great campaign issue that 
really motivates some voters, but if they actually did something to address it 
they would no longer have that great campaign issue so therefore they never 
will. Also, how many of those migrant farm hands take their pay and go back to 
Mexico at the end of the season? They can earn some dollars at less than 
minimum wage in the USA and then take those back to Mexico where they go 
farther due to lower living expenses. I know we've had an influx of refugees 
and asylum seekers in recent years, but I also suspect that a lot of the 
millions of border crossers every year are the same people over and over again. 
If we really had millions of people coming every year since I was a kid then 
Mexico would be empty by now. 


-Adam 




On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 8:55 AM Bill Prince < part15...@gmail.com > wrote: 



I call it the barbell curve. Not much happening in the middle; all the action 
at the ends. Inverse of the bell curve. 






-- 
bp 
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com 




On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 8:13 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) < 
li...@packetflux.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>


In social media, "the algorithm" is tuned to encourage engagement, and nothing 
encourages engagement like extreme viewpoints. The middle part of that bell 
curve is way too boring, so it doesn't get amplified like the edges. 


Mainstream media tends to exploit this as well. 





On Sun, Oct 6, 2024, 3:59 PM Robert < i...@avantwireless.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>

I like to call it the bell curve problem.. The edges of the bell curve where 
the extreme are getting way too much influence in today's world... 


On 10/6/24 1:22 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: 

<blockquote>

Each side seems to collect a certain number of the "unique" people. The right 
seems to collect the conspiracy theory non-critical thinkers. The left seems to 
collect the rediculous to the extreme social justice warrior types. And both 
sides collect few other groups with extreme viewpoints. 



Then, each side claims that the other side solely consists of those extreme 
views. Both sides say "ain't no way we want those nut jobs in power". Which is 
100% correct... if you include both side's nut jobs into the statement. 


On Sun, Oct 6, 2024, 12:16 PM < ch...@go-mtc.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>




I am happy being a deplorable “junk” person I guess. Not given to conspiracy 
theories. So sad to learn that I don’t have critical thinking skills. Who knew? 




From: Darin Steffl 
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2024 11:10 PM 
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] intersection of technical and political 


It makes sense that people who believe lies and conspiracies are more likely to 
be scammed than people who have critical thinking skills. Truth Social is 
filled with junk posts by junk people so if I were a scammer, I'd focus all my 
time there too. 


On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 10:00 PM Bill Prince < part15...@gmail.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>

No comment (and that should say it all). 






-- 
bp 
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com 




On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 12:00 PM Ken Hohhof < khoh...@kwom.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>




We try to avoid discussing politics here, and yes, no good can come from that. 

But it was inevitable that technical and politics would intersect. I didn’t 
expect to see it on Gizmodo though. 

If you have elderly relatives or friends who hang out on Truth Social, give 
them the usual public service announcement to watch out for scams. Apparently 
Truth Social is viewed as a target rich environment for scammers. 

https://gizmodo.com/truth-social-users-are-losing-ridiculous-sums-of-money-to-scams-2000506604
 -- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 


-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>


-- 


Darin Steffl 
Minnesota WiFi 
www.mnwifi.com 
507-634-WiFi 
Like us on Facebook 

-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>


</blockquote>

-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>
-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>
-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>

-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to